Re: [OM] 35mm vs. 28, 24, 21, 20mm

[Joel Wilcox]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like your ego had one of those big Iowa truckstop breakfasts.  ;^)
>>
>
>
> LOL.  Rockwell isn't the only Ken that shapes global photographic equipment
> demands.
>
> Don't forget, that an almost single-handed effort on my part kept the OM-2S
> from completely falling into a disrespected has-been pile.  For quite some
> time the 2S was being dissed left and right and I alone stepped out in
> praise of the camera to raise it up to its rightful place. I took some
> flaming arrows on that until one by one others spoke up and agreed that the
> camera had some worth.  I think there are a few list-members that will back
> that up as they wouldn't touch the camera and now it's among their
> favorites.
>
> AG (it ain't bragging if you can back it up) Schnozz

You do go out on a few limbs from time to time.  As long as the
children stay back, the innocent go unharmed. ;^)

Joel W.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/