| Subject: | Re: [OM] LV vs. EV and low light metering [was: Guru or Flack?] |
|---|---|
| From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:26:50 -0300 |
Brilliant. This is paradigmatic psychoanalytic reasoning, as any scientific reasoning is: question why the unexpected happens. Questions are more important than answers ... Fernando. Carlos J. Santisteban wrote: > > Yes, it is an error. So where does the -7 quote come from? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/08/2009: bench test of a new lens, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] LV vs. EV and low light metering [was: Guru or Flack?], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] LV vs. EV and low light metering [was: Guru or Flack?], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] The rule of 600, was: LV vs. EV and low light metering, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |