Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:27:43 -0500

>
> Back to your old tricks, I see; commenting on style, rather than
> substance. Both are x.ZUIKOs, and thus SC.
>


Tricks?  Did I say anything wrong?

:)

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] To OM2000 or not to OM2000, Wayne Harridge [OM] OM2000 + OM4, AS Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, DrT (George Themelis) Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, DrT (George Themelis) Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, DrT (George Themelis) Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Moose Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Ken Norton <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Moose
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] You know you need therapy when..., NSURIT
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, Moose
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM2000 + OM4, NSURIT
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]