| Subject: | Re: [OM] 35mm lens? |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:27:30 -0500 |
> > Is the "blacknosed" more desirable since it is multicoated? > > Does it really make a difference in use? > In the wide-angle lenses, I generally recommend the blacknosed variety. I have a 24/2.8 which is vastly superior to the silvernosed one I had. It does make a difference with color film. With B&W film, it's either a toss-up or a slight advantage towards the older ones. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 35mm lens?, Chris Crawford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 35mm lens?, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35mm lens?, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 35mm lens?, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |