| Subject: | Re: [OM] What worked, what didn't |
|---|---|
| From: | "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:59:18 +1200 |
Ken wrote > I was really wanting to leave all digital behind and in retrospect, I > could have. But I brought it along for good reason--for that one type of > shooting opportunity that digital is best at, but it never materialized > THIS time, but it has in the past. Well, without putting too sharp a point on it ( you thought I'd never ask ?? ), what IS that one type of shooting that Digital is best at? A curious mind wants to know. Brian Swale. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 3D (What worked, what didn't), Dawid Loubser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Radionuclide Scan, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] What worked, what didn't, ws |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] What worked, what didn't, Ken Norton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |