Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ( OM ) Digital landscapes - example

Subject: Re: [OM] ( OM ) Digital landscapes - example
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:12:07 +0800
Not only Olympus, looking at the MTF of many wide lenses, they fall to 
'earth' at the corner. BTW, the 24/2 at F4 performs better than a late 
design 17-40L (at 24/F4) even on the edges.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dawid Loubser"

> That may very well be. I am sure they also had to accept some
> compromises to
> achieve the small physical lens size (even the f/2 lenses are
> considerably smaller
> than any of their competitors that I have seen) - similar to how Leica
> allows
> their fast lenses to have serious light falloff towards the corners.
>
> On 05 Aug 2009, at 12:30 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> I was just joking, OM 35/2's performance is indeed very good. For the
>> extreme corners, there is no hope, all Zuiko F2 wide has the same
>> problem, I
>> believe the designer expected the corners to be covered by slide
>> mount.
>>
>> C.H.Ling

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz