Thanks for looking and commenting, Chuck :-)
Learned lots of thing while doing it, now I can make use of gradient
layers among other things.
At the moment, I started to do from scratch the one I had submitted to
the Landmarks event.
It's so badly scanned that I repent of having trusted the well renowned
photographer who charged I don't remember how much, for doing it.
Live and learn, that same photographer was the one who sold me the 4000,
when he bought the 5000.
Now I have one, and have learned a LOT from his carefulnesses.
How do you think a tight shot of Moon and Mars would look like with my
hopefully oil-free 300/4,5 ?
;-)
Fernando.
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Very nice and also very interesting. I'm wondering why the moon is
> rendered with 6 diffraction spikes. It look more like it was taken with
> an Newtonian telescope with a 3 arm spider than the 21/3.5.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|