ML Archiv: Re: [OM] An object of beauty

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] An object of beauty

from Andrew Fildes

Subject:	Re: [OM] An object of beauty
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:03:39 +1000

That's not necessarily a pleasant place to stand.
Andrew Fildes (not quite gone yet so watch what you say).
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 03/06/2009, at 9:28 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:

> Ah ha! Stepping into the gap being left by Andrew, are we? <g>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] An object of beauty, (continued) Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Moose Re: [OM] An object of beauty, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Moose Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] An object of beauty, SwissPace Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Andrew Fildes <= Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chris Barker Re: [OM] An object of beauty, ws Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Desks, film and jpgs, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] [OT] Image galleries, Nathan Wajsman
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] An object of beauty, Ken Norton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]