I agree some images will look great on print or full screen on monitor so
that's why I didn't show them with small size on web.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Whitmire"
> On May 14, 2009, at 9:50 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> It seems a better time for sleep :-) The photos look a bit harsh and
>> lack of
>> 3-D look especially the flowers.
>
> Oh, it _is_ a better time for sleep. But it's always interesting to
> snap away during the off hours because one never knows what one will
> get. I've printed a couple of the flowers, and while I wouldn't put
> them out for sale, the prints look about a billion times better than
> small images on the web.
>
> You and some of the others on this list are masters of floral
> photography; I don't even pretend. Mine were shot with a 70-200 zoom,
> with the sun nearly directly overhead. That said, I do like the 21mm
> tulip shot at 11x14 inches on my monitor. It really wasn't worth
> uploading as the display size is so small the depth of the shot is not
> apparent.
>
> --Bob Whitmire
> www.bwp33.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|