Why you have to load in PS and resave them, I only found #1 uses Adobe RGB
that could need a conversion.
I agree with you about #2 on the lower part (water reflections) but my eyes
were attracted by the upper part of the image.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose"
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>> I don't know what you have done to the images, at least for #2 the JPEG
>> artifacts is more than the original from Brian's site.
>>
>
>
> I meant to simply display them as I got them. Unfortunately, they have
> some problem such that Singapore won't display them with footers and
> navigation in that form. I assume something like the trouble Btian had
> with getting complete files to upload messed them up.
>
> All I did was have PS load and resave them. Generally, on such cycle
> with JPEGs that aren't too compressed won't be visible. #2, however
> already had compression problems, so they got a bit worse. If I'd known
> what I was getting into, I'd not have started.
>> I agreed that there are some JPEG artifacts due to compression but in my
>> monitor/eyes I have to look careful to find it out.
>>
>
> My eagle eye was immediately bothered by #2 when I first saw it.
> Blessing or curse?
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|