Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Tripods?

Subject: Re: [OM] Tripods?
From: Dawid Loubser <dawidl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:12:30 +0200
No disagreement there, I agree there is no substitute for the  
200-500/2.8.
I was simply questioning, as a photographer (who thinks he has been  
around the block
once or twice), the sanity of this lens.

I was just kidding about the OM-1 bit - since even a Canon 1D or NIkon  
D3 looks tiny
stuck to the back of this, I can't imagine what an OM must look like.


On 21 Apr 2009, at 7:20 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> I think the reason for the Sigma's existence is that your substitutes
> aren't really substitutes.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz