Re: [OM] Confession

[John Hudson]

That pole has been standing for a year or three. A recent visitor left the 
year of his / her visit seen here:

www.JohnHudsonPhoto.com/789.html

The upright erection fix is curious but not right. The pole was not upright. 
I am visiting the area again this summer and will take some more photos.

See here:

http://www.brilwalks.com/familywalks/Stanage/Stanage.php

and scroll down to the sixth row of thumbnails. Expand the rightmost 
thumbnail. Seen from a distance in the other direction from which I took my 
shot the pole is seen to be leaning.

My shot was taken with a 12-60 on a E510.

John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Confession


> John Hudson wrote:
>> http://www.johnhudsonphoto.com/788.html
>>
>
> Might one assume that the pole is neither bowed nor leaning?
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Hudson/StanagePole.htm>
> Otherwise lovely.
>
> The cause of perspective distortion is obvious. What lens did the barrel
> distortion?
>> The gravel road seen in the photo dates back to Roman times.
>>
>
> Apparently, gravel wears well.
>
> Moose
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/