Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape

Subject: Re: [OM] 90/2.0 vs 135/3.5 for distant landscape
From: Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:11:55 -0600
>
> * Yeah, AG, you aren't the only one. :-)
>


You know, I got momentarily distracted by the news of the E-620.  What a
cool camera and the first of the non-pro DSLRs (of any brand) that has
finally really gotten my attention.  But my wife was very quick (and
correct) in reminding me of those new OM bodies, lenses, motordrives and
flash gear that was supposed to carry me through until the E-1 wears out.

Yesterday, I booked another event shoot in April which will be heavily shot
on film.

Hmm....  How in the world are you supposed to WEAR OUT the E-1?

I'm never buying another single-digit E-body again.  They last too long.  ;)

AG-Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz