I was keeping it to myself but now that you ask I'll say it's not my
tree. I had to chuckle to myself when you talked about the 35/2's high
resolution and then presented us with an image with 3/4 of its area out
of focus. While it's not my own style of photography I've liked most of
your stuff of late but this I just find hard on the eyes.
Chuck Norcutt
Tom Fenwick wrote:
> Hmm. Perhaps Nathan is not the only one who doesn't like the large
> defocussed foreground area... This was becoming an interest of mine - here
> are another couple of examples! Maybe I should be barking up a different
> tree...
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/8943748@N07/3086057632/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/8943748@N07/3040480673/
>
> Tom
>
>
> Hi all.
>
>
>
>> Warning, on topic photo. 35/2 on 5D. I haven't really made much effort to
>> compare the 35/2 Zuiko with the Canon 35mm lenses, but basically I think
>> they're all good in their place... I've only taken the zuiko out a couple
>> of times so far, and I don't think I ever shot any colour film with it in
>> the old days, but I do see a lot of what I used to like about it in the 5D
>> files. Very high resolution with smooth low contrast that makes for lots of
>> options in printing. Definitely a keeper.
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/8943748@N07/3096567848/sizes/o/
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.16/1840 - Release Date: 12/9/2008
>> 4:53 PM
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|