Chris,
As I recall, the aircraft was a homebuilt kit plane, beautifully finished.
I'm no longer flying, so I am not current on the latest lighting rules.
What impressed me was the overall fit and finish of the lighting
installation.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 2:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Moose: Example of Fujifilm F10 Resolution
> That's an interesting lighting setup, Jim. I should think that it
> borders on the illegal, though. The navigation lights (clear and
> green ones) are supposed to be visible from a certain range of angles
> in the UK (120 deg for the coloured one, I think), but the chrome or
> alloy trim will reflect the light outside that angle, I should think.
> Also, the clear light is supposed to be visible from the rear, but the
> landing light (or taxi light) structure will obstruct that view.
>
> But perhaps the FAA has different rules for lighting from the CAA.
>
> Chris
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|