Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Nathan's PAD 26/10/2008: my kingdom

Subject: [OM] Re: Nathan's PAD 26/10/2008: my kingdom
From: James R <londonjames@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:00:00 +0000
Make that sheer... nothing shorn.

On 2 Nov 2008, at 22:47, James R wrote:

>
> Well I only qualify on the dual use - I have to make do with the back
> end of our sitting room. The shear stuff aspect would have been
> greater pre-tax season as I hadn't sorted out papers for over a year
> (the tail end of it all is to the fore).
>
> And I would score pretty highly in the sore neck stakes if that was a
> category, hence the contraptions that's labelled a chair by some.
>
> http://gallery.me.com/jamesroyall#100178
>
>
>
> On 2 Nov 2008, at 20:33, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>>
>> Only one grand prize I think and the judging criteria have already
>> started to appear -
>> - The sheer quantity of 'stuff' - papers, bits of camera, whatever.
>> (Ian's missus?)
>> - The number of peripherals, especially if they have stuff heaped on
>> them. And cabling.
>> - Quantity of shelving and cabinets, especially if nothing is filed
>> and there's no order.
>> - Imaginative use of old, decrepit or inappropriate furniture.
>> - Difficulties overcome - I like Chris' 5ft ceiling, for instance.
>> - Multiple use - Bob's is obviously a spare bedroom and Laundry as
>> well.
>>
>> A screen shot of someone else's desk is necessary.
>> Special mention for imaginative use of companion animal.
>> Andrew Fildes
>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/11/2008, at 1:57 AM, J. Van Brimmer wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> No problem. It's all fun. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, I want to know when the official judging will begin. OK, who
>>> will
>>> be the judge and what will the categories be?
>>>
>>> We could have a single judge, or take a vote, and here's a couple of
>>> categories for starters:
>>>
>>> 1.   The tidiest   (In the literal sense of the word)
>>>
>>> 2.   The messiest  (Literally)
>>>
>>> 3.   ? (Surely there's more)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> jv
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Andrew Fildes
>>> <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Whoops - abused the wrong guy. Sorry.
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's 'altitudinally challenged' - you of all people should know
>>>> that. Vertically challenged means that you keep falling over. An
>>>> early symptom is the inability to get a level horizon in  
>>>> landscapes.
>>>> Andrew Fildes
>>>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz