Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Indeed - I can buy an old Kodak digital for less than that, (no, not the DCS
> 420!) - blow the image up with rough interpolation and get a very Diana
> result.
>
I disagree. In my view, rough interpolation create a clumpy effect. I'm
not saying that's good "bad" or bad "bad", but that it looks very, very
different from the smooth look the Diana or Diana+ pinhole creates.
I've gotten too deep into this stuff. I've created a whole series of
images of the still-life I recently posted, using several different
cameras, lenses and filters.
I'd be interested to know which images those with the interest and
patience to check them out like, dislike, think look like Holga/Diana
images, etc.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Socks>
Just to keep it interesting, I've applied random number order to the
images and removed all metadata.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|