Only if the rock solid reason for the flood is simply because about 500
years has passed. No chance the Katrinas, or hurricanes, or Iowa floods
have any other coincidental reasons. Or maybe, like the pastor that
supports McCain said about Katrina being sent by god because the people
of New Orleans were overly sinful - the same must be true about Iowa.
Blaming god or 500 years is a lot more scientifically reputable than
calling out Bush on his continued overly religious cocky stupidity. Its
not even if anything could have been done in the last eight years to
prevent this, its just his imperceivable ignorance we're slapped with
just when you though it couldn't get worse.
Hey, wouldn't it be great to have him for a third term?
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Without arguing the global warming point (because I think it unnecessary
> here) I would submit that the definition of 500 year floods is that they
> are expected to occur about every 500 years based on history prior to
> any significant human influence on the environment.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> Larry wrote:
>
>> Some voted in a sleazebag TWICE! - that didn't believe in global
>> warming. The same people with strong enough blinders on to say Bush has
>> been an acceptable president (???!) are the ones who will now say that
>> this "500 year flood" has nothing to do with global warming.
>>
>>
>> Andrew Fildes wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/06/2008, at 3:46 AM, Timpe, Jim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've heard this being described now as a 500 year flood....
>>>> Almost Noah proportions.
>>>>
>>>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|