Oh dear - you will be thrown out the geek convention.
It's the lens - what LENS?!!
135mm with a close-up attachment? Tsk!
Not good enough. The 135/2.8 or 3.5? What attachment, f stop,
distance, time of day, wind direction...don't you keep a notebook?
Yeah 3, and I'm a chronic child hater - shame about the feet though.
My basic rule - if you've cut off the feet, crop off the legs too -
up to the waist. Make it look like you meant to.
#9 is good but I wonder what it would have been like with a polariser
to kill those reflection highlights and punch up the colours.
Probably worse. Hmmm.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 17/05/2008, at 10:10 AM, Brent wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> A pic I took of my daughter Lily on the slide at the park - there was
> a big storm coming in.
>
> http://homepage.mac.com/brent_rutherford/Kodak_Portra_April-
> May_2008/large-1.html
>
> Was using the OM-10 for convenience sake (haven't got a bunch of OM-1
> bodies which I love but the best bodies don't have working meters),
> and trying out Kodak Portra 400NC film. I like the film... nice
> colour, the printed photos are really nice - having trouble getting
> the same 'look' as the prints on the computer screen. There are a few
> other photos on the page below from the same film.
>
> Brent
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|