Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Jewellry, was...Happy Passover/Pesach

Subject: [OM] Re: Jewellry, was...Happy Passover/Pesach
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:27:46 -0400
Sorry, I didn't think you were referring to just the slight bend to form 
an oval.  So, yes, they certainly have been bent to that extent.

Chuck Norcutt

Marc Lawrence wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> <http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/wide-focus-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_145.html>
>> hasn't been bent.  It was a cylinder with a section cut out. ...
> 
> Are you sure? The internal dimesions show 65 x 50mm (2.5 x 2"), and that 
> gap/arc missing doesn't seem enough to effect a 15mm (0.5") change in 
> top to bottom diameter. This is similar to differences with others, such 
> as the one I mentioned:
> 
> <http://www.oyemodern.com/bracelets/aperture-cuff-by-re-vision/prod_143.html>
> 
> which has internal dimensions of 65 x 45mm (2.5 x 1.75"), which actually 
> a bigger difference not seeming accounted for by the gap.
> 
> Aside from the one you linked to, and the one above it at the main menu 
> for them, they all seem to have had similar "flattening" of their 
> circles to create a more wrist-fitting shape. This is the "bend" to 
> which I refer.
> 
> Cheers,
> Marc
> Noosa Heads, Oz
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz