Then the IS is better than I would have guessed.
Chuck Norcutt
Timpe, Jim wrote:
> Chuck said;
>
> I've never been there yet but will be doing so in the early fall. Since
>
> your 50-200 is the equivalent of 400mm on a 35mm camera I'd be concerned
>
> whether you could effectively utilize a longer lens. That's into the
> range where vibration and atmospheric turbulence can start to cause
> problems. You will at least need a sturdy tripod if you're going longer
>
> than 200mm.
>
>
> Except we don't know what body he's shooting. If it's a 510 or 3, the
> IS would let him hand hold considerably longer in good light. I hand
> held a zuiko 500mm mirror lens on my 510 with acceptable results.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|