Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: medium format film scanners

Subject: [OM] Re: medium format film scanners
From: "Geilfuss Charles" <Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:41:42 -0500
        Very nice image John. I also enjoyed the locomotive images.
Something about those old machines of that era. They almost have an
"alien" look.

Charlie

-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Hermanson
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:04 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: medium format film scanners


I've been using the Epson 4990 flatbead for mf negatives and been very
happy with it.  Here's a scan from a 120 neg shot by my father in Mexico
(?) after WWII. Scanned at 2400 dpi.

http://www.zuiko.com/album/B%20&%20W/slides/old-church.html

and all the B&W steam locomotive negs were also scanned with the epson

http://www.zuiko.com/album/B%20&%20W%20Steam/index.html

___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
631-424-2121 | http://www.zuiko.com
omtech1 AT verizon.net
Photo Gallery: http://www.zuiko.com/album/index.html


Clay Nichols wrote:
> John
> 
> I have tried almost every Coolscan scanner (and many other dedicated
> film scanners) and I been disappointed by the results. I have gone
> completely to a flat bed scanner. The scans are great and they are
> mechanically less prone to jams and other similar problems. Right now
> I am using an EPSON V750 Pro. Great scans but almost everything looks
> better after a quick buff up with Photoshop or similar program and
> the V750 is no exception.
> 
> As far as computing power, you are going to generate large files that
> need to be processed. That means as much processor speed, RAM and
> disk space as you can afford. Hope this helps. Clay Nichols Columbia,
> SC
> 
>>>> <om4t@xxxxxxxxxxx> 3/31/2008 12:53 PM >>>
> 
> 
> If anyone has experience with using a high end medium format film
> scanner I will appreciate whatever comments they might have to offer
> including info on the minimum computing power required to do justice
> to the scanner.
> 
> In particular, someone has suggested that the Nikon Super Coolscan
> 9000 ED is worth considering.
> 
> I know that this subject has been aired before and so to save list
> space taking up old news any off-list responses will be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> John Hudson
> 
> 
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx 
> ==============================================
> 
> 
> 
> ============================================== List usage info:
> http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies:
> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx 
> ==============================================
> 
> 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz