Maybe, but, as I said, unless it's set to +50, +25 the raw file displays
as underexposed. But it's not underexposed as evidenced by the embedded
JPEG.
Chuck Norcutt
Garth Wood wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> But, ignoring the color rendition of the first ACR sample, what accounts
>> for the significant underexposure? AFAIK, ACR is calibrated for a
>> particular camera. When I open a 5D image in ACR it has the brightness
>> level pre-adjusted to +50 and the contrast preadjusted to +25.
>
> Er, if that means ACR's adjusted for a particular camera, something's
> really wrong. Those are exactly the same defaults ACR uses on my rig
> when I import/open an Olympus .ORF file from the E-3 or E-410 (I just
> checked).
>
> I don't think ACR's doing anything that sophisticated -- it's just
> applying some compensation that's bog-standard and designed to make an
> "typical" image look better.
>
>
> Garth
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|