Would be really nice if they did OTF exposure :) and OTF flash.
Tim Hughes
--- Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not the back of course but the hump covering the large lens unit.
> Electronic control of the lens instead of mechanical.
> I wonder if the lens is cammed or whether focussing is by wire too.
> No ruby window on the back either but PC connection in the body top
> plate.
> I'm assuming that the clear patch in the brightline window is the RF
> patch so the the little round window will be a meter.
> I'd love to see that left dial closer - obviously shutter speed but
> is there an 'A' setting on it?
>
> In some ways I'm disappointed that they went so Ikonta. I always
> lusted after one of those little Plaubel Makinas with the Nikkor
> lens, although they had some reliability issues.
> http://www.nyclondon.com/articles/plaubel_makina_67_review.blog
> Only ever saw one once when a friend of mine rebuilt one and then
> sold it on (without loaning it to me, the swine).
>
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 03/02/2008, at 5:03 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> > I retract that. Destroyed by the back both esthetically and
> > practically by limiting access to the viewfinder. What is that hump?
> > Focal plane focuser? It appears to push the classic design of the
> > 40's with an electronic shutter! I don't think this one will see the
> > light of day.
> >
> > http://dvice.com/archives/2008/02/the_coolest_and.php
> >
> > Winsor
> > Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|