Hi,
IMHO 50/2 is more versatile than 35/3,5. I have got a ZD 50/2 and is
superb for portrait and macro purposes. Hair-raising resolution and
contrast but also a creamy sharming bokeh. You can read about both
lenses here:
35/3,5
http://www.photodo.com/topic_134.html
http://www.biofos.com/esystem/35mc_tst.html VERY GOOD REVIEW!!!
http://www.pixellum.com/blog/?2006/05/18/310-test-objectif-macro-olympus-zuiko-35
FRENCH
http://www.pixellum.com/blog/?2007/06/04/717-macrophotographie-olympus-e-300-zuiko-35mm
50/2
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/olympus_50_2/index.htm
http://www.photodo.com/topic_135.html
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/zd-50m.html
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2422/lens-test-olympus-zuiko-digital-50mm-f2-af-macro.html
http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/2422/lens-test-olympus-zuiko-digital-50mm-f2-af-macro-specifications-sqf-chart-page2.html
http://www.fourthirdsphoto.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=137
The best magazine testing lenses is www.colorfoto.de
You can buy any test for a small amount but you can also have a look
here and see what they wrote about Zuiko lenses:
http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/digital-forum/22040-four-thirds-lens-review-german-colorfoto.html
Hope this could help you to decide which one is more suitable for you.
Regards,
Dave
Ian Nichols wrote:
> On 26/11/2007, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/301932-REG/
>> Olympus_261003_50mm_f_2_0_Macro_ED.html
>>
>
> That's $624.90 for the pair, then, which at the current rate is
> £303.51. A lot less than £500.
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|