At 1/60 you're 3 stops down from the rule of thumb for a 400mm
equivalent. At 2 stops (1/125) it might look a lot better. A light
monopod might give you the third stop or even a fourth.
Chuck Norcutt
Dan Mitchell wrote:
>
> Oh, and while I'm here, a better IS comparison -- 50-200@200, 1/60th
> second, hand-held, but taken as carefully as I could both times --
> again, full-size crops:
>
> http://www.danielmitchell.net/temp/e3_is_off.jpg
> http://www.danielmitchell.net/temp/e3_is_on.jpg
>
> Again, IS isn't magic, but I reckon I could use the second shot in a
> pinch -- and "400mm" at 1/60th is not bad going.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
