Yep, I've pinged them a bunch of times and have done so again on the requested
lenses with the 410, E3, 510.
Tech support has always been responded to direct inquiries.? They never have
said directly why they haven't decided to support Oly at all---market share
decision or something about the CPU's in the lenses perhaps?
I would think a bunch of pings couldn't hurt.
The Achilles heel is the raw converter (see review in the 16-9 site) which may
be dramatically better in the upcoming upgrade. (We'll see)? I like the concept
of regaining some resolution with the fancy deconvolution algorithms, fixing
CA,? linear distortion, vignetting in one fell swoop.? Don't know if it is yet
worth the price of admission,? ( I hear Moose whisper "PT lens."), but is worth
keeping an eye on.
Mike
I think Mike has pinged DXO several times. I already submitted the
Zuiko 12-60mm as a lens they should support (and the Zuiko 7-14mm).
Maybe if enough people ask they will ...
<http://www.dxo.com/intl/photo/support/modules/availability/pb_availability>
-jeff
On Nov 6, 2007 10:12 AM, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hurrah!
>
> I shall have to sell my Bronica RF645, lenses and flash to finance my
> purchase. But at least that means that I shall be able to buy a
> 12-60. And that means that I will save the price of the 11-22 that I
> might otherwise have bought.
>
> Chris
>
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|