If it is about longivity, get the OM-1n, it will always be more
serviceable. Once the LCD in an OM-3 or 4 dies, it will be difficult
to replace. The electronics in the OM-1 are also much more
serviceable, circuits for OM-4 and 3Ti are "unavailable"...
Iwert.
2007/8/31, Leandro DUTRA <leandro.gfc.dutra@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> 2007/8/31, iwert bernakiewicz <zuikooh@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > No, THE big advantage of the 3Ti is it's light metering and multi
> > spot, no Leica can measure up to that. But the 4's do offer this as
> > well, at a much better price point.
>
> I ƿonder hoƿ uſeful an OM-4Ti is as compared to an OM-3Ti or R9 when
> its eletronics ceaſe ƿorking, be it for ſub-zero temperatures or for
> old age.
>
> So ðe route for my ƿife ſeems to be eiðer an OM-1(n) noƿ, and an
> OM-3Ti ƿhen ƿe can get it.
>
>
> > It is just that I like the 3Ti so much. It is a real nice camera, and
> > the best to me: almost no plastic parts.
>
> I have to ſay ðe E-510 ſurprised me, ſeems more ſolid ðan ðe metal
> OM-10. Have yet to touch an E-[13].
>
> --
> +55 (11) 5685 2219 xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
> +55 (11) 9406 7191 Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
> +55 (11) 5686 9607 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
> MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|