2007/8/31, iwert bernakiewicz <zuikooh@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> No, THE big advantage of the 3Ti is it's light metering and multi
> spot, no Leica can measure up to that. But the 4's do offer this as
> well, at a much better price point.
I ƿonder hoƿ uſeful an OM-4Ti is as compared to an OM-3Ti or R9 when
its eletronics ceaſe ƿorking, be it for ſub-zero temperatures or for
old age.
So ðe route for my ƿife ſeems to be eiðer an OM-1(n) noƿ, and an
OM-3Ti ƿhen ƿe can get it.
> It is just that I like the 3Ti so much. It is a real nice camera, and
> the best to me: almost no plastic parts.
I have to ſay ðe E-510 ſurprised me, ſeems more ſolid ðan ðe metal
OM-10. Have yet to touch an E-[13].
--
+55 (11) 5685 2219 xmpp:leandrod@xxxxxxxxxx
+55 (11) 9406 7191 Yahoo!: ymsgr:sendIM?lgcdutra
+55 (11) 5686 9607 ICQ/AIM: aim:GoIM?screenname=61287803
MSN: msnim:chat?contact=leandro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|