Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Winston Was Wax?

Subject: [OM] Re: Winston Was Wax?
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:46:29 -0700
Chris Barker wrote:
> Likewise, Moose.  I am not offended, but wearied.
>
> That idea of humour is cheap, as well as detracting from the message  
> of the action.
>
> I shall not bother reading the Online Photographer again.
>   
What? And miss Ctein* the great pro, display how far behind the digital 
curve he is by touting LCE as a whole new discovery to which he can open 
our eyes? Not saying he is or isn't a great photographer, nor that his 
discovery of common knowledge isn't exciting for him. Only suggesting 
that he and or Mike should recognize the problem and resist touting his 
ignorance.

And Erwin Puts* equating the limitations of film with the core of 
photography? His rant implies that, if a grainless, high sensitivity 
chemical sensor system of extremely high resolution had been invented in 
the 19th. century and used in film based photography for over 100 years, 
the discovery of sliver based film with it's grain, speed and resolution 
limitations, would herald the new golden age in which photography came 
into full flower and supplant all that came before for serious photography.

Moose, with his own rantz.

* Where does Mike get these guys? I mean Ctein (Cretin?) and Puts 
(Putz?). Did he make them up as yet another form of "humor".

Moose

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz