Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Picture without a camera

Subject: [OM] Re: Picture without a camera
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:35:09 +1000
There has to be intention - but the intention can be little more than  
intelligent recognition I think.
Botched? I'm hurt! I did that image deliberately, waving the F10  
around at a small gig.
Twenty shots were worthless, this one had something. Then I worked on  
it a while.
Quite like your Ghost as well Moose.
The next step is to actually frame them up properly - you know the  
routine.
About a 20x18 print matted up in a 30x40 black  frame - and see what  
reaction you get to them.
I'd lay odds that if we could get them hung somewhere, we'd have no  
trouble at all having them accepted as proper 'art'.
Especially if it's a 'giclee' print. :)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 30/07/2007, at 6:47 AM, Moose wrote:

>> It was art until I noticed the facial silhouette.  Then it became a
>> botched photograph.  :-)
>>
> How much of art is intention and how much intuition and/or luck?



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz