I'm sending you a copy of this note with an annotated version of your
image attached (three yellow pointer arrows) which won't show on the
list. The only one I'm pretty sure is a dust bunny is the center one on
the fender. The one at far left I think is one also. The one at far
right just ahead of the medallion is hard to see other than at 100%.
They don't show in the other images but I suspect they may be positioned
in shadow except for the one at far left which I think should show at
far left on the Indianapolis car. Since I can't see it there maybe it's
just a black spot in the green car. But the center spot at least
definitely strikes me as a dust bunny. It seems to have feathered edges
characteristic of a shadow.
Take a shot of the clear blue sky at f/16 or f/22. If they're there
you'll find them then. After my last cleaning I discovered I still had
three spots showing but only at f/16 or smaller. Since I rarely go
smaller than f/11 I've decided to leave them alone until something worse
shows up.
Chuck Norcutt
Larry wrote:
> Trying to see these dust bunnies. Do you mean on the right? Towards the
> top? Bottom? Middle? Any in the same position on other shots?
>
> Larry
>
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I'm partial to the reflected green woodie and the green Packard
>>
>> ps: The Packard shot seems to show some dust bunnies on the fender,
>> behind the fender at edge of the frame and just ahead of the medallion.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Larry wrote:
>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another great shot. You were up to the scanning challenge as well.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Speaking of cars, I posted some shots from the Greenwich Connecticut car
>>> show (easier linking directly to the 3 specific posts). As I mentioned
>>> in the post, the background and ambiance of the Greenwich Connecticut
>>> car show was very busy, so I did closer sections of various cars, etc.
>>> JPGs from the start. RAW was not involved.
>>>
>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608253
>>>
>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608328
>>>
>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=23608396
>>>
>>>
>>> Olympus content: Taken with my K10D and either 18-55 kit lens, or
>>> Tamron 70-300mm LD Di.
>>>
>>> For those comparing the attitudes in posts of "all the forums" here
>>> last week, yet other than olympus, only Nikon/Canon were included
>>> because every-other-brand-of-camera-doesn't-exist, these were shot with
>>> one of those nonexistant brands :).
>>>
>>> Larry
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================
>>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> ==============================================
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: image/jpeg
-- File: Larry's dust bunnies.jpg
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|