If you look at its MTF curves on the Olympus web site, it looks very
promising. It looks like the only thing it doesn't match the 50/2 with
is its aperture. Given its light weight and relatively low cost it is
a very very tempting option. Thanks for verifying that it is working
well. I think there is at least one other list member who has
mentioned it a time or two.
-jeff
On 5/30/07, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have one, Roger, and it works very well. It's very light and the
> front element is deep-set enough not to need a hood.
>
> Chris
>
> On 30 May 2007, at 09:45, Roger Key wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have experience of the 35mm macro lens? I am intending
> > to use it
> > principally with the E-330. I am wondering whether I will be just
> > about as
> > well off with my OM 50/3.5 macro. However, I can imagine that the
> > digital
> > lens would make a better all-round compact standard lens, in view
> > of the AF
> > capabilities.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|