Looks mighty fine to me.
Chuck Norcutt
Tom Fenwick wrote:
> Moose wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------
> I'm thinking these are in camera JPEGs, rather than RAW files converted
> to JPEG for web display. That would explain the different amount and
> characteristics of noise with brightness and possibly some of the
> slightly odd looking unsharpness in the body and front part of the wing.
> If that is true, the JPEG processor is pretty good, but we won't know
> the 'real' noise of the sensor system 'til we get some RAW source images.
>
> i can't tell for sure if Dick's samples were originally RAW. They do
> seem to have some of the same characteristics.
>
> Moose
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Say no more:
> www.pbase.com/tom_77/gasworks
>
> Two examples of an HQ jpeg with n.r. on and an unedited raw
> conversion. Interesting, and encouraging, I think!
>
> Tom
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|