Brian Swale wrote:
>
> I suggest that while things continue as at present, the digest is an even
> worse option. This last one is 3 6 9 KB !! For Pete's sake :-((
>
> At least with individual e-mails you can trash individual entries, but with
> the
> digest you get the whole shebang, chaff with the grain. Editing the digest
> (when this size) to keep the grain and trash the chaff, is a right royal pain
> in
> the backside.
>
I've never understood the digest. You get the same amount of stuff, but
as one undigestable* mass, rather than sorted out.
Particularly the last couple of days, when I could easily just skip
whole threads.
Moose
* (couldn't resist)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|