It is actually very hard to get an unsharp capture with the E330. I'm
used to quite a bit of wiggle room with the E-1. If one sharpens much
at all with the E330, it goes to jaggies at 100% very quickly.
Perhaps they have scaled back anti-aliasing filtration.
It is an odd comment about the cameras looks. Some people gotta have
that prism hump on their jewelry I suppose. ;^)
Joel W.
On 2/9/07, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From MyOlympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > 5. AP tests E330 vs Digilux 3 vs Lumix DMC-L1
> > Posted by: "David Bain" dcbaindammit@xxxxxxxxxxx dcbaindammit
> > Date: Thu Feb 8, 2007 2:43 pm ((PST))
> >
> > This week's Amateur Photographer tests these three and
> > the E330 (£655 UK price)comes out on top with the
> > Panasonic (£1500 UK price) and Leica (£1800 UK
> > price)equal second.
> >
> > Odd quotes :
> > "I would question the vision of someone who found the
> > E330 attractive". . ."some may feel all three cameras
> > on test here are challenged in the looks department"
> > "Olympus jpeg images are impressive and need less
> > sharpening post capture"
> > "Images from this camera are the most "filmic" and
> > less overtly digital in quality."
> >
> > Performance scores were: E330 - 28/30, Panasonic -
> > 25/30, Leica - 25/30 so you 330 owners can go around
> > looking smug for a while!
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|