Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus Digest V4 #31

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V4 #31
From: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:31:56 -0800
Actually, that's not correct.  The work on Lightroom started at Adobe  
well before Apple released Aperture.
The first version of Aperture had notably flawed RAW conversion, as  
well.

Stephen
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Listar wrote:

> From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: LightRoom Announcement
> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:07:29 -0800
>
>
>> From: "Jez Cunningham" <jez.cunningham@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The other distinction I've heard (on Lightroom podcasts) is that it's
>> primarily for RAW processing and all work on an image done in
>> Lightroom is
>> non-destructive.
>
> It's bad enough that Microsoft copies Apple, but now Adobe!
>
> Apple's Aperture has been doing this for almost two years now.
>
>
> :::: The epoch of the fossil fuels can only be a transitory and
> ephemeral event... which has exercised the most drastic influence
> experienced by the human species during its entire biological
> history. -- M. King Hubbert ::::
> :::: Jan Steinman <http://www.VeggieVanGogh.com> ::::
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz