A mere 46.
Stu
r.burnette@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 73 here. Can anyone top that?
>
> Robert
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Moore <paddy@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 19:19
> Subject: [OM] Re: List etiquette for replies
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>> * On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:10:24AM +1100, Wayne Harridge said:
>>
>>> Yep, sounds like what I was taught at high school too (about
>>>
>> 40 years ago !).
>>
>> Without intending to be too rude, I'm curious to know what
>> people consider
>> to be the average age of the list? (for the record
>> I'm a fledgling -- ish
>> -- 25, but I'm curious to see how it all falls out..
>> I think, without
>> being too rude, I'd taking a guess around 50 for the average
>> age, but
>> I may be very very wrong indeed.
>>
>> p.
>>
>> --
>> oOoOo "Bother!"
>> said Pooh, as he signed the
>> pact. oOoOo
>> oOoOo oOoOo
>>
>> oOoOo oOoOo
>>
>> oOoOo oOoOo
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:
>> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx==============================================
>>
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|