Didn't you previously say that you were getting much better results
from you 300D than you ever did with your OM2 ..... ??? If so you
need to buy better film or get it developed elsewhere.
---
Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V3 #320
From: "Allan Mee" <bigalsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:36:31 +0000
Yep the Canon 300D is a revelation - the quality of the images from it are
*FAR* superior to those from my OM2!
---
-jeff
On 12/2/06, Allan Mee <bigalsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmm today, I finally went through the menus of the 300D and discovered, much
> to my surprise, that it was mostly set for minimal quality shots (i.e.
> small, highly compressed JPEGs at ISO 200) - and that's what I've been
> shooting with.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|