Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: DNG issues with E-1 files

Subject: [OM] Re: DNG issues with E-1 files
From: "Jon Mitchell" <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:24:37 -0000
Likewise, I have been converting everything to DNG from my e330.  Any
thoughts on whether this problem is specific to the E1 or if it affects
all the E-series ?

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Chris Barker
Sent: 02 November 2006 06:47
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: DNG issues with E-1 files


Ken

That is disturbing information.  I had trusted that DNG were  
"untouched" files to all intents and purposes.

However, lately I have been using LightRoom to adjust images and then  
to export them to jpgs, so I don't think that it will have affected  
me recently.  But up until a few months ago I was converting  
everything to DNG ...

Chris

On 1 Nov 2006, at 19:09, AG Schnozz wrote:

> I downloaded the latest/greatest DNG converter from the Ad*be
> website and did some testing.  Previous attempts at DNG
> conversions on the E-1 files were less than successful, but I
> figured that I'd give it another go.
>
> I converted about 15 images and noted that the file size with
> lossless compression dropped to about 1/2.  Ok, good so far.
>
> Then I opened up the files in the lastest ACR and compared them
> to the original ORFs. Something was just a little off, but
> wasn't quite sure what.  There was something different in the
> highlights.
>
> Next I opened up the DNGs in RSE 2006, which supports DNG file
> formats.  Uh oh.  Lot's of pattern noise.  No, we're not talking
> subtle noise either, but in-your-face patterns resembling a
> maze.  Completely unusable noise.
>
> I reconverted the files into DNG not using the compression and
> tried again.  This time the noise changed, but was still
> present.
>
> What it looks like to me is that during the conversion to DNG,
> the bayer-matrix was shifted down and over by a pixel cell and
> the RG and BG placement was mis-mapped into adjacent cells.
>
> The ACR conversion appears to be supressing the pattern noise,
> but the luminous information isn't lined up with the color
> information.  I did not get an opportunity to test Lightroom on
> the files, but suspect that it uses the same ACR engine.
>
> At this point, I think I'll continue to stick with the original
> RAW files and not try to convert them to DNG. This is probably
> best because it allows me to still use Olympus Viewer for the
> odd picture where I want to utilize Olympus' color mapping.
>
> AG
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________

> ______________
> Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> (http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz