Much better focus on the kitty this time but it's overexposed. However,
dimes to donuts the negative isn't overexposed. Can you get a better scan?
Chuck Norcutt
Patrick Moore wrote:
> 'ello OM
>
> Following on from last time's kitten photo, here's another one ... slightly
> better:
>
> http://the.earth.li/~paddy/random/photo34_30a.jpg
>
> and a small landscape from the same day, just later on in the evening:
>
> http://the.earth.li/~paddy/random/photo20_16a.jpg
>
> They're not in the usual album as I haven't uploaded the rest, but I
> thought you may enjoy them anyway... they're a bit bigger than normal too,
> so grain ahoy. but hey.
>
> As ever, all comments welcome. :)
>
> p.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
