The images look terrible to me, more like something from one of those
ads in the back of a magazine except the price should be $39. I don't
understand why, but astronomical telescopes seem to make lousy camera
lenses. Televue telescopes are about as good as they come for small
astronomical telescopes but here are a bunch of terrestrial shots
that would cause a camera owner to change brands.
http://www.televue.com/engine/page.asp?ID=297
I would rather spend the $1000 on a good sharp zoom, or a telescope
better than this one.
http://meade.telescopes.com/site_search/index.php?
brand=51&cat=17&b=Meade&c=Telescopes
Actually you could probably buy both for that price.
Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA
On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:27 PM, USHER99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> This mirror telescope was recently written about as being super
> light (18 oz
> or 1.5 Kg) and will collapse into a package less than 6" long. It
> should be
> mountable on OM via C to OM. I wasn't that impressed with the
> sharpness of
> the images, though have never used anything like this. They are
> made in
> Hungary and are backordered for 2 months.
> Mike
>
> _http://www.tothtelescope.com/?
> p=details_models&id=9&PHPSESSID=59b9d0604b8de6e
> 3a3234d1e1167902c_
> (http://www.tothtelescope.com/?
> p=details_models&id=9&PHPSESSID=59b9d0604b8de6e3a3234d1e1167902c)
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|