| Subject: | [OM] Re: Sigma 55-200mm vs Zuiko 50-200mm |
|---|---|
| From: | Bernard Frangoulis <lists@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:02:07 +0200 |
>One thing to note on the Sigma is that it is not a constant aperture >lens like the ZD. No, the ZD 50-200mm is f/2.8-3.5 (otherwise it would be much bigger), and the ZD 40-150mm is f/3.5-4.5. Bernard ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Sigma 55-200mm vs Zuiko 50-200mm, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Sigma 55-200mm vs Zuiko 50-200mm, Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sigma 55-200mm vs Zuiko 50-200mm, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sigma 55-200mm vs Zuiko 50-200mm, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |