| Subject: | [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again |
|---|---|
| From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:40:04 -0700 |
The Chinon market is the market they apparently wanted. Winsor Long Beach, California, USA On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:44 AM, ALI wrote: > Kodak bought Chinon? WHY? I dont see Chinon as having expertise > that Kodak > required. Kodak should have bought Pentax or someone else with better > position > in the market. ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: ISO below 100 on E-1?, ALI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: ISO below 100 on E-1?, Winsor Crosby |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, ALI |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] [lens] Re: [AMIA-L] Reply: non-hazardous film cleaner, Tim Vitale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |