ML Archiv: [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again

Subject:	[OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again
From:	Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:40:04 -0700

The Chinon market is the market they apparently wanted.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:44 AM, ALI wrote:

> Kodak bought Chinon? WHY? I dont see Chinon as having expertise  
> that Kodak
> required.  Kodak should have bought Pentax or someone else with better
> position
> in the market.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, (continued) [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, AG Schnozz [OM] OT photos from the past, John Hudson [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, Geilfuss Charles [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, ScottGee1 [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, Chris Barker [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, James N. McBride [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, Chuck Norcutt [OM] Re: OT photos from the past, John Hudson [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, ScottGee1 [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, ALI [OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, Winsor Crosby <=

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: ISO below 100 on E-1?, ALI
Next by Date:	[OM] Re: ISO below 100 on E-1?, Winsor Crosby
Previous by Thread:	[OM] Re: Poor Kodak Follows Polaroid Again, ALI
Next by Thread:	[OM] [lens] Re: [AMIA-L] Reply: non-hazardous film cleaner, Tim Vitale
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]