Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Cibachromes

Subject: [OM] Re: Cibachromes
From: "Mostly" <mostly5@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:05:03 -0500
Holland Photo here in Austin does a superb job with Ilfochromes.  Or used
to, at least.  I'm not positive they're still doing them.
http://www.hollandphoto.com

Had a bunch of my Velvia shots from Antelope Canyon done there.  Contrast
masking, printing, etc. - they done good.

Dave

usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi all.
> Wonder what you think about Cibachromes for slides vs high res scan and 
> print on Epson 9800 with archival paper.  Found a place in CA that 
> still will do the Cibachromes.
>   
Cibachrome? I thought it became Ilfachrome some years ago. Sold and 
renamed again with Ilford's troubles?

Anyway, I think you may be asking the wrong question. The more important 
question is how good the people doing each process are.

Both processes are capable of absolutely wonderful results, in capable 
hands - and mediocrity in the wrong hands. Both are supposed, based on 
testing, not actual experience, to be archival out to 80+ years.

I gather Ciba/Ilfa chrome can be a difficult material to work with. But 
I have some Ilfachromes on my walls done by a friend who does his own 
printing that are startlingly natural, like a window onto the world.

I've never knowingly seen a 9800 print, but those from the smaller 
printers with the same inks can be just as good as the 'chromes. Never 
exactly the same, of course, so there is also the matter of personal taste.

Why not send the same image to both and see what they produce?

Moose



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz