On Jun 30, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> First, I'm glad to see on your website that you are still frugal.
Indeed I am.
> Your efforts are quite good. I like the shots, not what I usually
> see cross
> processed. As you probably know, that technique is frequently used in
> fashion shoots.
Thanks, I think that some of the richness in the colour may have been
lost. On my corrected screen at home (a mac) they're a great match
but at work they looked less vibrant. They still convey the basic
idea though.
I know it is very often used in fashion but I think that the added
colour and saturation really work with the grittier stuff I'm
shooting, the extra grain isn't a bother either.
> Your printing is also quite good. Home printing of color negatives
> is a
> challenging task.
Thanks but these aren't home printed. I'm re-taking the continuing
education colour photography course at the local art college. That
gives me access to colour enlargers and an RA-4 processor. It's still
tough balancing the colour (especially with some of the wonky colour
from the cross-processing) but this ensures that the processing is at
least consistent so I don't get shifts from that too.
Andrew "Frugal" Dacey
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|