Ah, the lighter version works for me. I'd leave the foreground as it is
now. I think I'd still prefer a bit less saturation on the sky but it's
your picture.
Chuck Norcutt
Guillaume Remy wrote:
> Thanks for your answers,
> About the foreground: actually, I was thinking about something like that, but
> couldn't make my
> mind up about lighter or darker. Lighter seemed unnatural to my eyes. Darker
> and I felt like
> having 1/3 of the frame lost in the black outerspace... check the updated
> versions:
> original http://homeusers.brutele.be/guillaumme_remy/_tmp/index.html
> lighter http://homeusers.brutele.be/guillaumme_remy/_tmp/01.html
> darker http://homeusers.brutele.be/guillaumme_remy/_tmp/02.html
> About the sky; this is now a bit less saturated... some further advice ?
>
> Guillaume
>
> ---
>
> From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
> Subject: [OM] Re: Aurora pic - your comments ?
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:21:30 +0000
>
> I tend to agree. Being an ol' farm boy raised amongst and tending to a
> herd of over 250 polled Herefords, I was far more interested in and
> distracted by the mysterious foreground, trying to figure out if the
> darker objects were a cow or two or, as it now appears, a feed rack and a
> hay wagon. I think either lighter or darker would be more better. The
> sky's gaudy, but I kinda like gaudy sometimes.
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>Nice but I have difficulty with the foreground. I think it should be
>>either darker or lighter. As it is, the barely visible foreground
>>details keep drawing my attention from the sky and I'm straining to
>
> see
>
>>what's there. I suggest that you either make it darker such that I
>>can't see much of any detail or else bring the foreground brightness
>
> up
>
>>a bit so I don't have to strain to see what's there.
>>
>>The sky might also benefit from being less saturated and a bit more
>
> real
>
>>looking but that I can't say for sure.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>Guillaume Remy wrote:
>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>
>>>Being mainly a lurker on this list, I'm submitting today my first
>
> pic !
>
>>>http://homeusers.brutele.be/guillaumme_remy/_tmp/index.html
>>>Taken with OM4, Tamron 28/2.5 on Fuji Sensia 200, this is the
>
> result from a
>
>>Moose-like treatment
>>
>>>from 2 different exposures...
>>>Any comments welcome...
>>>
>>>Guillaume
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son
> interface révolutionnaire.
> http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|