Hey, steady on there Keith, you can't just bring a thread back on topic just
like that you know. Eitquette 'round these parts requires first a
discussion of the appropriate firearms to deal with the offending feral
whatever they are, THEN we get to wonder if feeding them Krispy Kremes would
be acceptabel, and THEN...
Or try here: http://www.geebeephoto.com/2006/06100.htm and wonder how on
earht the thread got here from *there!
Don't worry, you'll get the hang of things pretty soon :-)
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of keith_w
Sent: 27 May 2006 17:48
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Image #100
Chris Barker wrote:
> Good point, Keith: why should we still have Graham's photo number 100
> in the subject line when we have gone well-OT?
>
Now that I've established that the Subject line number refers to a photo
number, where IS that photo? Where are any photos?
Or was this a submission of Graham's, wherein he listed a site containing a
lot of numbered photos?
I guess I could just forget it, and get on with my life! <big grin>
keith
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|