I've been using an A2 for almost two years now. I'm still impressed by the
8MP output. Have you tried shooting in RAW mode? Shoot in RAW mode and use
a good converter (Raw Shooter essentials is free and brings out the
details better than any other). You'll see what the A1/A2's are really
capable of.
Still doesn't match a good Zuiko prime on the SLR/c though!
Paul
>
> The A1 continues to impress me and I'm able to get results that
> occasionally blow away 35mm. However, not always. My capitol
> building and railroad shot was done with three cameras. The IS-3
> shots were OK, the A1 shots were great and the OM-2S 24/2.8 and
> 50/3.5 shots are off the chart. For the A1 images to hold up as
> well as they do in comparison to high-quality 35mm shots is
> impressive.
>
> The other day I had a Velvia 100F "Mystery Roll" developed.
> Funny, it contained over a year of shots on it. Anyway, I
> finally found those missing Grand Canyon shots. Compared to the
> A1 shots, amazingly enough the A1 shots are a little sharper,
> about the same grain/noise level, definitely more "colorful",
> but lacked the 3D'ness of the film shots. One picture in
> particular I quickly scanned for Joel and didn't do any PP to.
> Just straight out of the Coolscan V. It was very interesting
> because it looked like you could step over each ridge all the
> way to the horizon.
>
> AG
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|