But the main point of the criticism was that the similarly priced
competition does offer IS and that the camera is non-competitive on that
point.
Chuck Norcutt
Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Hmmmm...I didn't find the images 'pretty soft' - in fact I thought
> them sharper than most in this class and certainly on a par with the
> Canon S2 and Sony H1. There was some colour fringing but nothing
> unpleasant.
> And, as I'm fond of saying, IS doesn't guarantee sharp results unless
> you know what you're doing. It's only half the story.
> AndrewF
>
>
> On 07/02/2006, at 9:43 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>><http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusSP500UZ/>
>>
>>Bottom line, not a bad camera overall but this is a 10X zoom and in
>>the
>>10X zoom market you better have image stabilization like your
>>competitors. This one don't got it. This one you don't want to
>>got it
>>either.
>>
>>What does this presage about the E-3 perhaps? At least the dust
>>will be
>>destabilized as well.
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|